LAB Grading Criteria

LAB Grading Criteria

DLIP: Lab Demo and Report Grading Criteria

2025

Presentation and Demo

Grading Criteria
Rubric
Score (30+5)

Completeness and Analysis (14)

Completeness (10)

Achieving all research goals

10/8/6/0

Evaluation and Analysis (4)

Clear Evaluation Index / Analysis of experiment results

4/3/1

Creativity/Complexity (8)

Complexity (4)

Level complexity

4/3/1

Originality (4)

Similarities and improvements from past projects. Highest score for original project

4/3/1

Presentation (8)

Presentation Quality (4)

Presentation contents and skill

4/3/1

Demo Video Quality (4)

Quality of Demo Video

4/3/1

Extra (5)

Custom Dataset (2)

Fully Custom Data

2/1/0

Bonus Point (3)

Peer Evaluation (Top 40%): 1st place (3), Runner-ups (2)

3/2/0

Lab Report

Excellent

Good

Avg.

Poor

None

Completeness

(10) Easy to follow, has all necessary explanations

(8) A few missing info of (dataset link, source link etc)

(6) not enough explanations/ some missing info

(4) Hard to follow

0

Results Analysis / Discussion

(5) Good Analysis /Discussion (precision/accuracy etc )

-

(3) Partial analysis

-

0

Format

(5) Neat/Consistent format, easy to read

(4) Need some improvement

-

(3) Need many improvement (No name, title , not consistent format etc)

0 (not a report format)


~2024

Excellent

Good

Avg.

None

Completeness

(10) Successful results

(8) Partial success

(6) Need many improvements

0

Complexity

(5) Complex

(3) Moderate

(1) Easy

0

Contents

(5) Originality

(3) Significant improvement of previous/online materials

(1) Very similar to previous labs/online materials

0

Lab Report

Excellent

Good

Avg.

Poor

None

Completeness

(10) Easy to follow, has all necessary explanations

(8) A few missing info of (dataset link, source link etc)

(6) not enough explanations/ some missing info

(4) Hard to follow

0

Results Analysis / Discussion

(5) Good Analysis /Discussion (precision/accuracy etc )

-

(3) Partial analysis

-

0

Format

(5) Neat/Consistent format, easy to read

(4) Need some improvement

-

(3) Need many improvement (No name, title , not consistent format etc)

0 (not a report format)

Last updated

Was this helpful?