Lab Report Grading Criteria
Last updated
Last updated
Excellent
Good
Avg.
Poor
None
Process Description (10)
(10) Included all instructions/procedures with reasoning
(Flow chart, image-processing steps etc)
(8) Explains the whole process clearly with a few missing information
(6) Explains the whole process with some missing info
(4) Poor process description
(0)
No explanation
Output
/ Discussion (5)
(5) Excellent output /
and Good Discussion
(achievement of project goal/ precision/accuracy etc )
(4) Acceptable Outcome with
analysis
(3) Acceptable Outcome without analysis
-
(0) Not acceptable outcome
Format (5)
(5) Neat/Consistent format,
easy to read.
Includes all necessary sections: Introduction/Procedures/Output/Discussion etc)
(4) Need some improvement
-
(3) Need many improvements
(No name, title , not consistent format etc)
0
(not a report format)
Bonus/Penalty
up to +5: good readability code, good logic, etc
up to -5 penalty: poor logic, not following instructions, report images missing etc